|
March 13, 2008
Quality and Accuracy of Hospital Information
| TO: |
Chief Executive Officers |
| |
Chief Medical Officers |
| |
Chief Financial Officers |
| |
Chief Information Officers |
| |
Quality Directors |
| |
Medical Records Directors |
| |
Infection Control and Prevention Directors |
| |
COMPdata Contacts |
Now is the ideal time to review your hospital’s policies and procedures on the
accuracy, completeness, and alignment of all patient data being used for
billing, performance measurement, public reporting, and patient medical records.
There are several developments converging at one time that require
completeness and consistency in reported data. These developments include:
Hospital executive attestation on quality and completeness of
administrative data for public reporting
Merging of Medicare administrative and clinical quality inpatient and
outpatient claims and quality data
Recovery Audit Contractors
Reporting Data to IDPH
Starting with 1st Quarter 2008, there are a number of changes
that have been announced and become effective with 1st Quarter 2008
inpatient and outpatient data reported to Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH)
as well as strict enforcement of some existing rules.
Listed below are the areas of concern as we move forward with 1st
Quarter 2008 data that IDPH will be strictly enforcing:
- 1st Quarter 2008 inpatient discharges, outpatient surgical cases, and
other outpatient reported data must be reported in either the new format or
the HIPAA 837 4010A1 version. All Illinois hospitals have had staff attend
training within the past 9 months and over 60% of all Illinois hospitals have
tested and are in production with the new formats for 1st Quarter
2008 cases and discharges.
- The submission deadlines are strictly adhered to by IDPH. IDPH will not
allow hospitals to submit new or corrected patient level data for 1st
quarter 2008 after the deadline of June 4, 2008. Detailed schedules for
reporting are available by clicking here at the
bottom of the page under deadlines.
- Under the Consumer Guide rules, IDPH is requiring hospitals to report
their monthly counts of inpatients and outpatient surgical patients on an
ongoing basis. The deadline for 1st Quarter 2008 inpatient and
outpatient monthly count is May 30, 2008.
These monthly counts must be submitted by the deadline date which is about
5 days before the patient level data deadlines. The monthly counts form the
denominator for each month and the actual patient level data that meets all
edits form the numerator --- and the result is your hospital’s level of
reporting compliance.
- The Consumer Guide Rules require hospitals to achieve a 98% level of
inpatient reporting compliance for every month calculated as noted above.
Hospitals are provided ongoing feedback reports every time they submit data
and both feedback reports - Data Quality Summary Report and Data Submission
Verification Report provide your hospital’s level of compliance.
- Hospital CEOs will be required to sign a form each quarter provided by
IDPH attesting to the hospital’s accuracy, completeness, and quality of data
reported for the quarter. This form will be available in both hard copy and
electronic format and will be provided by IDPH after the quarterly submission
deadlines.
Hospitals are encouraged to review their current practices and procedures to
ensure that the IDPH requirements are met and the deadlines adhered to as IDPH
is requiring IHA to strictly enforce the deadline policies. While COMPdata may
accept data after the deadlines, IDPH will not accept data after the deadline
and the publicly reported data will only include IDPH data received by the
deadline.
Merging of Medicare Claims and Quality Data
Medicare started to merge their hospital inpatient claims and quality data
together recently and as a result many hospitals have had problems with missing
data for the quality reporting and have found themselves struggling to comply
and maintain their annual Medicare market basket increase. Additionally, several
hospitals are experiencing challenges at validation time when their quality
information is different than the information utilized for billing or contained
in the medical record.
Some of the most common problems are:
- Medicare patients that are under Medicare HMO or Medicare Advantage
plans should be recorded in the Medicare Hospital Quality Alliance reporting
as Medicare Other. It is important to maintain this distinction and report
it accurately as Medicare only has in its possession the Medicare only claims
for matching purposes and not the Medicare Advantage or HMO claims (as they
are handled by the HMO or Advantage plans).
- Incomplete medical record documentation often times results in failing
validation and putting the hospital at risk for their Medicare annual payment
update (market basket increase). This often times is the result of:
- Lack of authorized physician or clinician signatures
- Diagnostic test results administered but results not in medical record. This
is most common in some hospitals that have separate infection control and
reporting information systems that are not integrated with billing, medical
records, or the EHR . Hospitals should have results documented in medical
record and if patient left without knowing results, the attending physician or
other clinician should contact patient with any positive test results.
- The discharge status of a patient can drive the hospital payment,
especially when the patient is discharged to a non-acute care setting or home
health services. Most hospitals conduct a follow up with Medicare patients
that were discharged home to ensure that no additional services were required
for the patient within the Medicare prescribed time periods. As often times
this falls upon medical records or discharge planning to conduct the follow
up, hospitals are encouraged to have alignment of results and for any
status changes to be communicated with the financial billing areas for any
adjustments to claims.
- Starting 4th Quarter 2007, the Point of Origin for Admission
or Visit element used in billing, Illinois public reporting, and Medicare
quality reporting was changed in terms of title and content to mean the place
of origin outside the hospital with a few documented exceptions. For
example, a patient that is transferred from a nursing home to the emergency
room of a hospital, prior to 4th quarter 2007, had the origin
typically reported as emergency room prior to October 1, 2007. The origin now
would be correctly reported as nursing home.
By using the revenue codes, health plans and others can identify all of the
patients that come through the emergency room and at the same time identify
the location of the patient prior to their hospital care. This new code also
helps in confirming that a Medicare patient that came from a nursing home and
returned to home could also mean that the patient was returning home to their
nursing home. Medicare also uses this information to identify transfer cases
that may or may not qualify for inclusion in the hospital quality reporting.
As Medicare utilizes this code for both quality and payment purposes, it is
important to record accurately and consistently. As the accurate reporting
of this element relies heavily on admitting staff and often time emergency
room staff to document the source of origin, it is important that they are
aware of the changes and requirements for documenting and accurately recording
this information.
Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
As noted in a prior IHA memo earlier this month, (click
here) the RACs have a great deal of leeway in terms of what they can pursue
on hospital billing and claims audits. As illustrated in the memo, accurate
coding and documentation is essential. Completeness of medical records will be
essential and inclusion of all diseases and conditions, such as infections, will
be critical as Medicare moves to reducing payments for hospital acquired
conditions in federal fiscal year 2009. As Medicare currently reimburses
hospitals for participation and completeness of Hospital Quality Alliance
measurements and soon will be transitioning to Value Based Purchasing, it is
critical that hospitals make sure that their claims and quality performance
measurement elements that are common for billing and quality performance
reporting are aligned. While Illinois is currently scheduled to begin the RAC
program in 1st Quarter 2009, hospitals are urged to review their
processes and procedures for populating billing elements to ensure alignment and
to do periodic internal audits of information in preparation for the RAC.
Unlike developments in the past, we are now seeing increasing linkages of
administrative and claims data and additional scrutiny and auditing of
performance and billing data. Hospitals should take time to ensure their
reporting is accurate and complete and their information and reporting systems
are aligned.
As additional developments occur or are anticipated in the oversight and
review of hospital data for claims and quality performance, IHA will continue to
keep you informed so that you may strategically plan ahead. If you have any
questions, please contact Pat Merryweather by e-mail at
pmerryweather@ihastaff.org.
Thank you.
|